W**g C**n refused entry to New Zealand :)

Who the fuck would want to play at a site he owns?

Playing on the same site as him would be bad enough.

Unfortunately, I think it would draw in a lot of players, similar to how his Rumble in the Jungle event seems to pull in a lot.

I'd never go anywhere near a site owned by him though, as the types of players I imagine it would attract are the ones who look to him as an example on how to be a ghillie sniper (spawncamping, deliberate headshots, questionable hit-calling, no care for playing the objectives etc.)
 
I have seen a dog at a RIFT event once, but in the car park (safe zone), always with the owner, who wasn't a player, and they weren't walking around with it. Pretty sure they checked with the staff beforehand too, they seemed very responsible people.
I know one of the marshals has his dog there quite frequently at Redcon but she was checked and approved and I know another chap who wasn't playing another day who was approved in advance to take his dog there. I don't imagine Bailey bothered or thought to check first.
 
How can he not understand an airsoft site is usually not the best place to bring a pet? There are individual cases where dogs won't get stressed out, bolt or react in a harmful way to the sound of pyro going off but Tony has no way of knowing Bailey's dog would be fine with it. I also assume that liability insurance is specific about non-approved animals being at the event.
This is true. I’d never bring my dog to a game day as (as you said) there’s too much risk she’d get scared by the pyro. God forbid someone thinks it’s a good idea to take a dog into the game zone 🫠

In my case, I was allowed to bring my dog to a carboot sale, but decided against it on the day for similar reasons you’ve listed.
 
Back
Top