• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

planned sas black kit loadout

seriously.. WTF why dont people trust these.. they are designed to deflect a 9mm bullet, they arn't flat lenses and are extremly thick.. btw i dont mean just shotting straight at it with a 9mm bullet.. but still a 6mm bb wont even scratch the surface of it..


No way man defect a 9mm bullet from a bit of plastic and a bit of rubber? no chance.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No way man defect a 9mm bullet from a bit of plastic and a bit of rubber? no chance.
first i didnt mean point blank shooting a 9mm bullet and the way the lenses are made make it possible to deflect not take impact in the corner -.- you can break a double glazed window by throwing a stone at the corner ffs.. everything thing is weak in the corners even mesh in face masks... ill make a video of me shooting mine with my l96.. and have you ever had any real information for someone thats used them for there REAL purpose ? not airsoft.. ?

 
does it really matter? this shows they aren't suitable for airsoft! and theres no need getting worked up over something like this lmfao, everyone who has asked if there suitable the answer is always no get some poly carb lenses.

 
Point is even if their weak point is the corners then it's no good using them. You can't pick where you get shot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
TBH i dont see why you would take a chance with somehting like this

You can buy a set of bolistic lences

But you carnt buy a set of replacement eyes....

 
but are you gunna risk it?(also, its quite reasonable to be shot at by something a little too hot.

it only takes one stray sniper round to do the damage.
i knew someone would say a sniper lol do you not play with engagment distances? and 410 fps for 10cms away with o.3s will never happen.. 1. if your at a half decend site surely they chrono your gun. 2. the bang rule? and 3. 10 cms!! in the eye??

 
A lot of sites operate a sniper rifle limit of 500fps and a alot of snipers prefer high quality .3g ammo thus making a 400fps (maybe higher) rifle, yes i think its Very likely.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of sites operate a sniper rifle limit of 500fps and a alot of snipers prefer high quality .3g ammo those making a 400fps (maybe higher) rifle, yes i think its Very likely.
10cms away ? the closest engagement distance ive ever heard of is 20 metres not 10 cms.. by the time it hits you its no where near 500 fps

 
It's not just the other team you've got to bear in mind, you've got think of friendly fire too, and that's likely to be a lot closer. Safety is paramount with anything like this, you just don't risk something like your eyes if there is a fair chance of something happening.

 
I am afraid the SAS will not have switched to a SIG rifle, the only weapon they will have switched to is the HK 53 (MP5 in 5.56mm).
To my knowledge they are still using the Pigskin waistcoats as the carry all ammunition on their leg, the vest caries 4x Flashbangs or CS grenades, an axe, a knife, and baton rounds for the breaching shotgun.

Modern look

PASGT (looks like the Bristol made helmet they use)

S10(with airsoft safe lenses)

Pigskin or Black MOLLE vest with Grenade pouches

Black overalls (they moved off the blue a while ago)

Hip holster for the pistol (they don't use Drop legs for pistols as they aren't as secure)

Drop leg for the SMG/Rifle mags

The SIG 552 is really not going to do the loadout any favours, stick with an MP5 or people will just tell you how bad it looks. At the moment you look will be a SWAT loadout not SAS CRW.


the reason im going to use the sig 552 is because i already have one and cant afford to buy a new gun... unless its going cheap ;)

 
the reason im going to use the sig 552 is because i already have one and cant afford to buy a new gun... unless its going cheap ;)
i have a classic army mpa5 :) which is what they use

It's not just the other team you've got to bear in mind, you've got think of friendly fire too, and that's likely to be a lot closer. Safety is paramount with anything like this, you just don't risk something like your eyes if there is a fair chance of something happening.
well i used one a CQB many times got shot in the mask many times and its totally fine..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
the point isn't that it shouldn't happen and you should not shoot at people close range with anything over 350FPS, But I HAVE shot hubert basically point blank with mah 510FPS Dragunov, purely out of surprise of him being there. If it put a hole in his webbing, it will but a hole in non-balistic goggles. and then your eye.

 
the point isn't that it shouldn't happen and you should not shoot at people close range with anything over 350FPS, But I HAVE shot hubert basically point blank with mah 510FPS Dragunov, purely out of surprise of him being there. If it put a hole in his webbing, it will but a hole in non-balistic goggles. and then your eye.
remind me to never play with you lol :P does your site not operate an engagement range?

 
Its more about addreniline reaction shots then sticking by the rules i know i have dont it a couple of times with out meaning to

I said sorry and we laughed about it afterwards

(you would say sorry if the guy you just shot happens to own the site...)

 
Its more about addreniline reaction shots then sticking by the rules i know i have dont it a couple of times with out meaning to
I said sorry and we laughed about it afterwards

(you would say sorry if the guy you just shot happens to own the site...)
lol but i wouldnt use an S10 out doors anyway just a pair of shooting glasses :)

 
Back
Top