Had another example of this feeling on Sunday:
Was really looking forward to playing at RIFT's The Defilade site; as my last game there was brilliant. Andy, who runs the site, is good people.
Got there, it was grey and damp, but I had dressed appropriately.
Chrono'd my A&K PKM - too hot. Suspected it would be, but there you go. It was. Fair enough, back in the bag. I'll use my back up.
My back up, a TM Uzi, jammed first game. Fortunately it was easily fixed - I suspect the HOP rubber was too tight.
But...but...the opposition was accumulating a lot of accusations of non-hit-taking. I suspected it from about 20 minutes in, and four other team-mates voiced their grievances about it too.
Andy was informed and words were had with the accused, but it was still going on until lunchtime. Myself and my team left at lunchtime - we were only doing half days due to other commitments IRL, but the whole experience left me flat, deflated, demotivated to do it all again.
The Defilade is a new site. It is frequented by up-and-coming new players, young players, players who are learning the ropes. It has been running for 15 weeks. And yet, the safe-zone conversation, when the talk of the non-hit-taking player/s was brought up was 'Yeah, it's *REDACTED* but hey, that's *REDACTED* for you..."
The players knew who it was.
The owner knew who it was.
The marshall was pointed towards who it was from game 1.
And yet.
I'm in a quandary. Do I keep supporting a new, local site with vast potential, which is five minutes away from me, with my walk-on fees and attendance. Or do I go back to Ace Combat; an hour's drive away but where I've barely had any reason to suspect non-hit-taking?