A private seller has the same liability as a retailer under the VCRAYou don't need ukara to buy or sell second hand rif's as a private person and proves nothing overall. Good/bad intentions can't be measured by a number. I wouldn't sell a RIF to an underaged kid but that's a different story altogether.
Legally how would any of us would be responsible for someone else's action? This ever happened actually or we're just making up stories here for silly arguments?
Liability for a subsequent criminal act lays with the criminal conducting the act and there are prosecutions for these
I am unaware of any VCRA sale prosecutions, but they carry maximum sentencing of 51 weeks and/or a level 5 fine.
(Level 5 in Scotland is capped at £5000, but in England that has been uncapped to an unlimited fine
(Even though the original industry representation did propose a licence based on the same game count of the UKARA membership number none of this is explicit in the Airsoft statutory instrument - only the intent to play Airsoft skirmishing at an insured site)
So the seller has no obligation to validate UKARA membership
Only to be able to reasonably establish a VCRA defence of Airsoft, museum, reenactment, theatrical, crown servant
You could ask about UKARA and just believe the buyer (that would just depend on the court deciding that’s reasonable - the lack of an online validation could support just believing)
A Facebook profile or forum membership could do the job
Or as per a mention up above just asking for a statement could be valid - there was a retailer that did the same thing with a VCRA defence tick box
It’s highly unlikely for a private seller to need up in court for a VCRA sale charge, but a very simple question or look at a posting history would be an instant defence to a criminal record and also weed out some of the high risk chav sales