Rogerborg
Supporters
- Aug 22, 2017
- 9,190
- 6,049
Just a topic of discussion, prompted by having my AEP apart again to fix the last thing I'd fixed.
For those who haven't had one apart, the piston in an AEP pushes air up through a nozzle housing, which is essentially a hollow tube with the piston pushing up from below, and the nozzle running through it.
View attachment 39586
View attachment 39587
And the nozzle itself is also a hollow tube. It's pulled backwards to allow a BB up into the hop unit, then is pushed forwards again by a spring and spring guide inside it. A hole in the bottom of the nozzle, with O-rings on either side, allows air up from that round hole in the bottom of the nozzle housing. There's a constriction inside nozzle just behind the rear O-ring against which the nozzle spring seats, and the end of the spring guide has an o-ring to seal against that ridge, ostensibly blocking off the rear of the hollow nozzle and persuading the air to go forwards.
View attachment 39591
The problem with this arrangement is that it's tricky to see how it produces a perfect seal. The spring guide O-ring must necessarily be smaller than the spring. The constriction inside the nozzle has to be larger than the O-ring on the end of spring guide, as it slides over that ring when the nozzle moves back. When it comes forwards again, everything has to line up perfectly in order for the ring to seal against the constriction.
There are spring guides that attempt to ameliorate this with double O-rings, and I may double-up mine, or at least heat-n-stretch it.
But the thing I can't understand is: why not seal the rear of the nozzle completely so that all the air has to go forwards?
It seems like this could be bodged into a nozzle by dropping a small solid disc inside it. No need to even glue it in, spring pressure will hold it tight against the constricted section. Then lop off the front off of the spring guide so that it doesn't foul it when the nozzle is retracted (it only needs to come back 6mm or so to let a BB up). You might have to lop a coil off of the spring to allow for the thickness of the solid disc, you might not.
View attachment 39590
Is this mental? The standard version seems overly complex and prone to leaking. What am I missing here?
For those who haven't had one apart, the piston in an AEP pushes air up through a nozzle housing, which is essentially a hollow tube with the piston pushing up from below, and the nozzle running through it.
View attachment 39586
View attachment 39587
And the nozzle itself is also a hollow tube. It's pulled backwards to allow a BB up into the hop unit, then is pushed forwards again by a spring and spring guide inside it. A hole in the bottom of the nozzle, with O-rings on either side, allows air up from that round hole in the bottom of the nozzle housing. There's a constriction inside nozzle just behind the rear O-ring against which the nozzle spring seats, and the end of the spring guide has an o-ring to seal against that ridge, ostensibly blocking off the rear of the hollow nozzle and persuading the air to go forwards.
View attachment 39591
The problem with this arrangement is that it's tricky to see how it produces a perfect seal. The spring guide O-ring must necessarily be smaller than the spring. The constriction inside the nozzle has to be larger than the O-ring on the end of spring guide, as it slides over that ring when the nozzle moves back. When it comes forwards again, everything has to line up perfectly in order for the ring to seal against the constriction.
There are spring guides that attempt to ameliorate this with double O-rings, and I may double-up mine, or at least heat-n-stretch it.
But the thing I can't understand is: why not seal the rear of the nozzle completely so that all the air has to go forwards?
It seems like this could be bodged into a nozzle by dropping a small solid disc inside it. No need to even glue it in, spring pressure will hold it tight against the constricted section. Then lop off the front off of the spring guide so that it doesn't foul it when the nozzle is retracted (it only needs to come back 6mm or so to let a BB up). You might have to lop a coil off of the spring to allow for the thickness of the solid disc, you might not.
View attachment 39590
Is this mental? The standard version seems overly complex and prone to leaking. What am I missing here?
Last edited by a moderator: