my choice of M4 looks, no more, no less. http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/8512/sshortykl2.jpg With a P90, it's extremely easy to take apart and I will upgrade it internally, almost everything. KAC.. just looks different, will still do heavy modifying.
I know sweet FA but I do like the look of M7 - just looks like a custom or bespoke build to me with CNC RIS, adjustable stock - or the M4 folding could be good for CQB - tough call of the two - but like looks of M7
the p90 reviews are saying its complete shite. The first one does look ok, but I can't understand why you wouldn't just buy a G&G cqb style m4, they have some really short ones in their range. They are also durable, or so I have heard.
I know LevelCap did a video on the AEG P90 but he doesn't know much anyway and I just can't see those guns being very reliable or long lasting. Best to get a G&G and customise it.
If you can do basic internal tuning then AEG/JG are a decent option. Externals,I will be honest, are pure sh*t on most JGs but they can withstand reasonable amounts of abuse for ACM. Still feel fragile compared to other companies. Internals,as I usually say are better than a lot of higher end companies,it's just that they need work to actually perform.
I can perform internal tuning very well as i've had to open up my AK gearbox countless times, so the p90 can be a viable option for me but, i will actually consider a G&G, it just depends how much other parts will cost all together (shorter barrel, ris front end, basically to make it look like a Noveske Diplomat 7.5)
just see if m7 is compatible with most other stuff then upgrade with G&G stuff when needed.
I prefer stuff to work well but m7 does look nice to me. As for tweaking or changing stuff - think we all will swap some bits about in the end & still never be 101% happy