I didn't mention anything about the effectiveness of laws; you have created a strawman argument.
Again, I did not mention how they work; another strawman argument.
Compare the number of gun deaths per capita in the USA with the same data for western nations that have highly restrictive gun laws; that alone destroys your argument.
It isn't discrimination.
They have a useful and reasonable purpose.
Because that would lead to mayhem, as in the USA.
The U.K. never had a shooting problem or gun crime problem.
And we still don’t so our laws have changed nothing.
Ok so tell me why this mayhem in the USA is happen, by whom and where?
the majority of gun deaths in the US are suicide.
The majority of crime in the US comes from 5 major cities.
All have strict laws.
The US has the worst gang problem out of all first world countries.
Again why is the debates on this subject not really in your favour?
Do you actually watch them or just want to stay in this bubble?
And you are calling my points strawman because you can’t address them…
You are advocating for nanny state policies.
But can’t give me evidence that they will work?
So why push them?
Makes no sense.
No they haven’t been a problem for thousands of years, a minority always have misused them.
Why are we seen them used more now than ever with more laws than ever?
So all they will do is sharpen them pointy or use another knife…
That is discrimination.
You want to section out people who own an object who have done nothing wrong.
You are treating them differently.
All tools have a reasonable purpose?
That’s why they were made.